Friday, 4 July 2008

Unwanted



Imagine being tied to a chair with your eyelids stapled open while someone flashes a strobe light in your face and blares death metal music in your ears for two hours.

That's how I felt watching Wanted.

It seems a lot of people quite liked this film, or at least didn't mind it - the two friends I watched it with both enjoyed it and it's apparently doing so well at the box office that Hollywood are knocking Mark Millar's door down for more (even though this ended up being one of the loosest comic book adaptations ever to hit the screen, moving completely away from its author's original Secret Society of Super-villains concept and porn-star Eminem hero). Yep, a lot of people want more Wanted.

Me, I hated it. But I'm not entirely alone. Two people who also found problems (though they didn't find it quite as despicable as I seemed to) were Dan and Tone. Dan commented, "every single character was a sociopath and so I had trouble feeling positive about any of them". Tone added "it's difficult to root for anyone in a movie this amoral, where even the lead delights in the slaughter, and also comes across as a bit of a tit... I did feel the need to wash my hands afterwards." I'd agree... but I'd also go much, much further. I didn't so much want to wash my hands as scrub out my mind. This was the most depressing and insidiously cynical movie I've seen since the Nazi propaganda of Starship Troopers or the Bible Belt sermonising of Forrest Gump. It was, in short, nihilism on film. If I thought this was an accurate representation of the human race, I'd have gunned down everyone in the cinema, myself included. Wash my hands? Bleach out my eyes!

Now, those of you who have been reading this blog for a while will realise that I have no problem with cynicism. I'm a natural born pessimist. I can happily do depressing too. Misanthropy? Bring it on! I love the films of Todd Solondz and Neil LaBute - two of the most misanthropic filmmakers you could ever hope to meet. Fight Club is in my All Time Top Five. And unlike Dan, who says he prefers his heroes to always wear white hats, I've no problem with anti-heroes. As long as they have some depth.

Depth is something Wanted sorely lacked. As is subtlety. As is humour. These three elements are essential if you're going to make a movie as bleak and violent and inhuman as this. Instead we got completely undeveloped, one-dimensional characters (the nerd revenge fantasy, the cold-hearted bitch who comes good, the Morgan Freeman), total sensory assault, and lad-mag gags ("he's the man!" or whatever McAvoy's cuckolding best mate kept saying - hard to hear above the cacophony). Of course, I shouldn't have expected anything else from a movie based on a Mark Millar comic - king of the Shock-and-Awe-minus-Common-Sense approach to storytelling, the man who once had Venom punch a hole through Spider-man's chest only to reveal moments later to his thoroughly cheated audience that, actually, that wasn't the real Spider-Man, it was just some guy who happened to be standing around on a rooftop in a Spider-Man costume and - in the middle of a fight - had been mistaken for the real thing by Venom, a character who would have been able to sense the impostor from a mile away. Subtlety? Depth? A sense of humour? Mark Millar knows not these things...

19 rants and reactions:

dave said...

should i take it you didn't like it then matey?

Rol said...

Did I give that impression? Sorry!

Nick! said...

Well, it sounds like the movie has actually watered down the nihilistic cynicism of the original...

Does the central character, at the end of the movie, list a string of ways in which the normal people in the audience are worthless, pathetic drones, laugh about taking their money, and give them a big "fuck you" for buying tickets and turning up?

Because that is, almost word for word, how the original finished. I swear, breaking the fourth wall n'all...

If anything, I'd be surprised if this particular director didn't at least bring a fresh visual flair that was lacking from the original book - Night and DayWatch are as incomprehensible as you'd expect a Russian movie to be, but they were at least true originals in terms of spectacle.

Wanted the comic book was the strung-together rehash of past action-movie glories that you'd expect from the guy who seems to have made himself mega-famous from carefully retracing Ellis and Morrison's footsteps, only without any sticky new "concepts" or "ideas" to make them difficult for mass-audiences to digest.

(On the other hand, writing for JRJR is at least making Kick-Ass a great read, much to my surprise...!)

Rol said...

Actually, I hated Nightwatch too so it was never going to be a good combination.

Your assessment of Millar's abilities tallies with my own... I'd be interested in knowing if the movie's high concept "loom of fate" was out of the comic or not. That sounded like a watered down Morrison idea that would have had a lot more class - or weirdosity - under Grant.

Nick! said...

Rol> I've heard about the "loom of fate" and was just recently thinking about whether or not it might have been in the comic.

If it IS, it is only a very minor piece of deus ex machina, rather than a full on macguffin.

Or to put it another way, the super-villains in the comic used something to make the superheroes, and the population of the planet, forget that the superheroes ever existed. At which point the villains went "legit", dialling down the combative or chaotic elements of what they did, because they no longer had competition.

The conflict in the piece ends up coming from a Joker analogue, who is only really interested in the chaos, rather then in profit and an easy life.

It's one of the few original wrinkles that Millar managed in the book, although deep down it's only really a mashing up of the now-commonplace "Superheroes were everywhere, now they're not/illegal/all dead" motif that's been everywhere since the eighties, and the also commonplace "the vampires/monsters are there, but the only reason you don't see them everywhere is because they realised that the best way to survive was to form guilds/families/cults and co-exist with humans" motif, that I first noticed in the Vampire games, but runs through almost everything gothicky that's come out in the last twenty years.

The method by which the villains achieved this re-write of continuity was never a major part of the story, but probably was exposited in an offhand, forgettable way. But the loom of fate seems like an easy fit for it.

Can I just say again that I am really enjoying Kick-Ass? Just for the sake of balance? ;-)

Nick! said...

Also, I loved Night and Daywatch, as a purely selfish "got nothing better to do", "middle of the night while Girl One was away" thing.

As I watched them, I was totally aware of how utterly obtuse and viewer-unfriendly they were, and there's no way in the world I could recommend them...

(Get Smart had less to it, but I could recommend it to almost anybody, as it is a very likeable, funny and almost entirely inoffensive movie, and that's not such a bad thing once in a while)

... because I don't think anyone I know would even sit through them, let alone enjoy them.

But really, if someone could train the lunatic director into some semblance of discipline, I think he could make wonderful things happen. It's this sort of dischord between vision and cohesion that really makes me appreciate a Del Toro all the more...

Rol said...

It sounds even less like the film than I imagined.

JRJR could make me even read Millar... but I'll wait for the trade.

I suppose you won't want to hear MY "all the heroes are dead" pitch now? Shame.

Nick! said...

Sir, I love a cool take on an old motif. The problem I have with Millar is the hyperbole vs the output, not the fact that he's making a moshpit of the genre...

I like a good yarn, and I don't require that it be original, as long as it's honest...!

To be frank, I was pretty much holding out for an awesome pay-off with Wanted throughout it's run, because it was fun enough. But the "kick in the teeth" final monologue was one of the few truly offensive pieces of writing I've ever read, and was badly placed/planned/plotted besides...

It made me forget that I liked the artist, it was so bad...!

Nick! said...

Also, why do I always fail to write reviews on my own website? I can clearly ramble critically about films and comics as well (or interminably!) as the next angry fanperson...

Rol said...

You're obviously too busy twittering (which I just don't understand at all... and am not sure I want to). ;-)

mark e said...

Hahaha, you really have to start checking the trailers first :)

Honestly, it's like watching a porno and moaning that relationships and love haven't been represented :)

What you saw was gun-porn of the highest quality with the lowest storytelling responsibility. The film was clichéd, souless and offensive but in it's defence I would say that it never packaged itself as anything more than that.

It took everything that Shoot 'Em Up laughed at and tried to make a serious film.

I wonder if Brad Pitt ever watches Tomb Raider and remembers when Angelina didn't look like a stick insect with a frown.

Jay said...

Whereas I absoultely love Nightwatch and Daywatch (I've even got the Russian editions of the DVDs, which have extra/different scenes for the home crowd)... Haven't seen Wanted yet, as it came out just as we went on holiday, but when I saw Timur Bekmambetov's name down for directing duties, I was immediately in the cinema queue... And hell, I accidentally ended up seeing The Happening the other week. I'm expecting nothing but good after that!

Nige Lowrey said...

Millar often talks the talk but crawls the walk...Ultimates was made great by the art, Wanted had just as nice art but was both goofy and mean, not a complete whole and Civil War ultimately was a macguffin that set a new status quo but forgot to tell a tight story (much of it relying on spinoffs to fill in events that should have been told in the main story).I picked up the first Millar/McNiven Wolverine and it looked good but was just Unforgiven with Clint as Wolverine.

Kick Ass though...will somebody PLEASE either tell JRJR to start putting some effort in, get a decent inker in on him (imagineKnolan!! Ooh!) or just shoot him--non fatally, just enough so he knows...

Dan said...

I liked nightwatch for the subtitles, but have yet to see Daywatch (or is that the other way round?)

But Starship Troopers nazi propaganda? Surely it was a satire of that rather thatn an actual example?

But what do I know about films. I'm typing this while watching High School Musical 2 for the second time tonight. And you know what, I actually think it's a good film and am looking forward to High School Musical 3 being released in October.

Rol said...

Mark - I'm not sure you could tell how seriously they were going to take it from the trailer (that's my excuse anyway). I enjoyed Shoot 'Em Up exactly because it knew how ridiculous it all was and never pretended to be anything but.

Jay - afraid I'll take a bad Shyamalan film over a bad Bekmambetov film any day.

Nige - you need to get over this JRJR hatred. It's not good for you. The man's a genius. ;-)

Dan - so you've missed the hidden Nazi subtext in High School Musical? See, that's how they get you!

kelvingreen said...

Ah, you've noticed the trademarked Mark Millar non-cliffhanger too? Does the man know how to write a real cliffhanger instead of endless variations of "Look, this happened! Oh no, it didn't, but just looked like it did!"

See also, Clor in Civil Bore.

Rol said...

I'm looking forward to the 'Death Of The Invisible Woman' for just that reason.

kelvingreen said...

RTD almost did a Millar Cliffhanger with the "regeneration" last week, but managed to write his way out of it, just. Millar seems to just use it as a cheap way to trick his readers.

I seem to be ranting. This blog brings out the misanthropy in me.

Rol said...

That's my aim in life.

Fairness to RTD - at least he spent a lot of time setting up the Doctor's hand as a plot device (it was the gun in the drawer, forever waiting to be fired). Millar would have just brought it in without ever mentioning it before, and then laughed in our faces.