Though I have great respect for those songwriters (including Springsteen, Bragg, Morrissey / Marr, and Cocker) who steadfastly refuse to allow their music to be used for the purposes of evil advertising, I have less problem these days with young or struggling bands selling out if in the process they get a nice cheque with which to record their next album, and maybe get their music heard by a slew of new fans too. So when I hear Chairlift or Feist on the iPod ads, I think 'good on them' - they're not selling out, they're just doing their bit to get noticed and get paid in an increasingly difficult business.
I have less time for established, millionaire songwriters like Bob Dylan - who's apparently just allowed 'Blowin' In The Wind' be licensed for an ad about the Co-Op - because really, Bob, do you actually need that money? Still, it could be worse - it could be Tesco or Walmart. At least Dylan is choosy.
Because then I see something like this... and I shudder at the grubby, out-of-town motel room where musicians and admen go to shag each other senseless.
If youtube won't allow you to watch that where you are - consider yourself blessed. It's Iggy Pop - the man, not the musician - selling car insurance. Has it really come to this, Iggy?
I saw Iggy Pop live about ten years ago, and he was hugely entertaining - a complete showman. Fighting with the security guards, jumping off the stage, tearing off his clothes like Bruce Banner after hitting his thumb with a hammer... It was all an act, but it was great fun to watch. I don't believe he's the spirit of punk or anything like that... but I did think he had more self respect than to sell his soul to the oleaginous devils of the insurance industry.
At least British punks have more self respect. You'd never catch Johnny Rotten selling car insurance (then again, who'd ever buy car insurance from Lydon?). No, King Yob of the Pistols sticks to selling butter.
And don't get me started on Norwich Union - sinking millions of pounds of their customers' money into a completely gratuitous namechange campaign in the worst financial marketplace since the Second World War... and roping in the likes of Alice Cooper, Elle Macpherson, Ringo Starr, and Bruce Willis in the process... because I'm certain they all needed the money too. I'm not even going to link to that advert, because frankly - it's obscene.
Oh, and Ringo... yes, I think Beatlemania would still have happened if you'd still been called Richard Starkey. I don't think your bloody name had anything to do with it, mate.


22 rants and reactions:
I tried to write a similar blog to this last week, but lost the will.
I mean, maybe Iggy does need the money. That makes me feel bad.
If he does, it's probably only because he blew it all on hookers and coke and other such rock star pursuits.
I don't think Pop did it for the money but because he wants as many people as possible to see how buff he is for a man his age with his shirt off.
Eurrrghh! If that's buff, I'll stick with my blossoming manboobs.
I'm with you here. I'm similarly p*ssed off with Julie Walters, fresh from her role in Mama Mia, belabouring me about testing my smoke alarms. Why did we have to pay a 'celeb' to do that? I'm deliberatly not testing them as a protest, and we'll probably all die as a result (and then they'll be sorry).
But the irritatingly dulce mobile ads have introduced me to some good young talents - Yael Naim, Lisa Mitchell - traditional routes to discovery having been vigorously ravaged by the likes of Simon Cowell.
Wow...I had no idea about either of those ads. The Iggy Pop one makes me very sad, but the Johnny Rotten one doesn't really surprise me. He's generally pretty open about selling out for money, including those Sex Pistols reunions. In fact, butter is probably less offensive than a Pistols reunion.
I had tickets for the Pistols at Brixton Academy (I think) a few months back. Ended up not going. I never saw them back in the day - too young - and, I dunno, I didn't want him asking me if I've ever got the feeling I've been had... then again, we still paid for them, so, yes, I do get the feeling I've been had, Mr R.
"I'm similarly p*ssed off with Julie Walter... ...belabouring me about testing my smoke alarms. Why did we have to pay a 'celeb' to do that? I'm deliberatly not testing them as a protest"
Ha ha! Excellent. Yeah, she's overly aggresive, really. If you're that bothered, Walters, why do't YOU f***ing come round here and do it for me? Any day except Wednesdays.
I guess the recession is hitting them too huh?
That Iggy Pop ad makes me want to throw things at my TV and is yet another reason why I avoid commercial telly where possible ;o)
I like the Iggy Pop one, it's so ridiculous! But then I don't have any particular affection for Iggy Pop. I probably wouldn't feel quite the same if was...erm.. Billy Bragg...for example.
But yes - 'Eurrghh!' for the shirt off shenanigans!
Brother T - I have to admit, I've missed the Julie Walters ads - I only saw the Iggy Pop one when I was at my mum's, and someone had to show me the NU on youtube... like Penelope, I try to avoid ads wherever possible.
Punk - like you, I'm more upset by Iggy... but then I never had much respect for Lydon anyway.
Chimesey - Julie Walters can only do Wednesday next week, so she's sending Victoria Wood round on Tuesday.
Beth - the day Billy Bragg does one (except for Marmite) is the day I get rid of my TV - and my record collection - completely.
Completely obvious I know but sucking Satan's pecker, each and every last one of them.
Did you see this? I assume it will be up on youtube before long...
http://www.newsfromme.com/archives/2009_01_28.html#016588
Yeah totally with you. I came over all depressed when I saw Mr Pop twitching his sweaty sixpack like a good little marionette and as for Rotten... well, I covered that debacle in a post of my own before Christmas. Unfortunately Celebrity sells and celebrities are the most bought commodity on the planet. At least Julie Walters is selling something useful and of moral value...
Beautifully illustrated. And I agree entirely. For a while I had a problem with up and coming bands selling their songs, but in the era of downloaded music you've got to make a buck somehow. Not so much the biggies, though.
Hello there... care to add your blog at KeywordDir.info?
Steve I: That should be interesting to see, though I'm sure it'll be material we're familiar with. Wonder who will take the rap?
Steve II: I remember your outrage well, though as others have said, Lydon sold out years ago. Pop on the other hand... well, I thought he had more dignity.
Free Man - absolutely, no problem with new and struggling bands using advertising to make themselves heard (and get paid)... but the old guard made their fortunes when there WAS money in the music industry. If they've blown it all subsequently, I have little sympathy.
Yeah we have - its probably more interesting to see Letterman's genuine regret - I'm assuming there's some preamble that we're not seeing on this clip here.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpmb0SYRGhE
do folk still watch ads on TV??
Dunno about you, but if I'm ever watching any channel with an ad, I go surfing through various music channels for a couple of minutes and the go back to what I was watching.
I very rarely watch live TV myself, JC, preferring instead to video the few shows I want and watch later - fast-forwarding through the ads!
I don't watch anything live any more. Even must-see stuff like Galactica is set to record, and I start watching it 15 minutes in, so I can skip the ad breaks.
But, if you get Sky, they have that firkin Iggy Pop ad on every sci-fi programme as part of some bloody sponsorship deal...
And if you continue to ffwd through the ads, Chev, they'll send Iggy round to scream through your letterbox.
Post a Comment