One cost somewhere between $200 and $260 million to produce... the other cost between $11,000 and $15,000. (Accurate production budgets seem impossible to pin down via the internet.)
One takes away 158 minutes of your life you'll never get back (though it feels like much more)... the other zips by in 86, leaving you wanting more.
One wastes big Hollywood names like John Cusack, Woody Harrelson and Danny Glover and forces distinguished actors like Chiwetel Ejiofor, Jimi Mistry, George Segal and Oliver Platt to regurgitate the kind of lumpen dialogue Lucas would have rejected as trite... while the other casts two unknowns and lets them ad lib naturally to create believable, rounded, appealing characters.
One blows the GDP of a small country on the kind of cynical, bloated and obscene CGI escape routines that start out preposterous and have nowhere to go from there... whereas the other contains possibly 4 or 5 low key fx shots that ramp up the tension to unbelievable heights and have the audience literally screaming in their seats.
One manages to generate little in the way of excitement by destroying the entire planet... the other fixes a handheld camera on a sleeping couple and makes it impossible to tear your eyes away from the screen.
One revels in the kind of stupid disaster movie cliches that sank many an ocean liner and destroyed innumerable national monuments across the world for nothing more than hollow spectacle... the other uses classic horror film thrills while jettisoning the gratuitous gore that's mired much of the genre in recent years to wonderfully refreshing effect.
One has the kind of mawkish, overblown, patronising and nonsensical ending you'd expect from the man who gave us the worst film of the last decade*... while the other has one of the most heartstopping, "What The Fuck?", you'll-need-new-pants climaxes I've seen in years.
Both are doing big business at the multiplexes... one will be far more profitable than the other.
And the winner is...?
By the way, I ignored the warnings and went by myself. Sadly, I wasn't alone. The showing was sold out, and I was probably the oldest person in the theatre... by at least twenty years. It was however quite heartening to see how this tiny, one camera / no gore horror flick held the hyperactive teen audience's attention in a way 2012 never could. Two young lads sitting next to me started the film complaining about the wobbly video camera footage ("What? Is it gonna be like this all the way through?") and ended up shrieking, "aw no - no way - I've gotta get out of here!" You could see the relief on their faces as the lights went back up.
*10,000BC - at least the addition of an extra 12,012 years can't make things any worse.














