Wednesday, 29 June 2011

Green Lantern




I don't like Green Lantern.

Never have.

Yeah, I read the comic when I was a kid. I read all sorts of tat when I was a kid. But apart from the days when Dave Gibbons was drawing him, and a soft spot for dumb redneck Green Lantern Guy Gardener in Justice League International, I never really got into the character. The problem with Green Lantern will always be too much power. He can do anything. He can do everything. The only limits are his imagination. Plus, like a lot of DC superheroes, the costume is more important than the man. We don't care about Hal Jordan because he doesn't have a life beyond saving the world. I can't relate to that in the way I relate to Peter Parker or Matt Murdoch or Ben Grimm. Because the secret identity is the mask, everything beneath the costume is a cipher.

Then again, I don't like Superman either, for many of the same reasons. Yet I still enjoyed 3 of the Superman movies (the first two Christopher Reeves more than the Brandon Routh) and I've managed to stick with Smallville through waaay too many dead horse flogging seasons. So it's not impossible to make a fun movie or TV show out of a comics character I have little interest in. You just have to put in a little effort. Sadly, director Martin Campbell, his five screenwriters, and most of the cast just don't bother. Green Lantern is one of the worst films I've ever seen. It's not just bad, it's Forrest Gump bad. And it don't get no worse than that, buddy.

Like Thor, Green Lantern spends half its time on Earth, and the other half in the stars. The difference is that when Thor had its head in the clouds, we were being treated to cod Shakespearian camp - a meaty chunk of soap that made the sci fi much easier to swallow. When Green Lantern is in space, we just get video game visuals and video game plotting. Then when Thor was on the ground, we got a fish out of water comedy, a gutsy love interest and impressive action sequences. When Green Lantern comes down to earth, we get Blake Lively and a helicopter on a willpower-created rollercoaster. And for all the nonsense backstory of Thor, at least it was a nonsense backstory based on epic Norse mythology. With Green Lantern, we get this...

Billions of years ago, a group of immortals harnessed the most powerful force in existence: the emerald energy of willpower. These immortals, the guardians of the universe, built a world from where they could watch over all of existence: the planet Oa. A ring powered by the energy of will was sent to every sector of the universe to select or recruit. In order to be chosen by the ring, one had to be without fear. Together these recruits formed the intergalactic peacekeepers known as the Green Lantern Corps...

I swear to god, if I'd submitted that for a first year high school English assignment to write my own science fiction story, I'd have failed. "The emerald energy of willpower"? Do what now? "In order to be chosen by the ring, one had to be without fear." Because fear and willpower are connected how? What's that legendary line Harrison Ford allegedly gave George Lucas? "You can type this shit, but you sure as hell can't say it." Guys, do you not think there are some concepts from 60s comic mythology that should be left in the gutter of the 20th century? Use the characters if you must, try and sell them to the modern age... but at least have a little respect for the intelligence of your audience. And for god's sake, don't open your film with five minutes of such asinine exposition... say what you want about George Lucas, but "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away" suddenly sounds like high art.

It's sad, because the shrill and unpleasant poutiness of Blake Lively aside, there are some decent actors trying their hardest to make the most of Green Lantern. Peter Sarsgaard. Mark Strong. Tim Robbins. Hell, even Ryan Reynolds. Say what you like about him, but Reynolds has movie star charisma up the wazoo. He's got that Cary Grant / Harrison Ford grin down pat, and sometimes that's all you need to play the hero. He just doesn't get chance here. None of them do.

Green Lantern is a wasted opportunity. A waste of money. And most of all, a waste of time. I can't remember the last time I was so bored by a film. Or by any other activity save cleaning the toilet. This movie sapped my will to live. I couldn't even leave the theatre, so bad was the bright green halo of torpor. Maybe it wasn't willpower those immortal Oan guardians harnessed after all... maybe it was tedium. The green power of tedium. Maybe it really is the most powerful force in all the universe...


10 rants and reactions:

kelvingreen said...

The trailers looked appalling, and I couldn't believe that they were still putting the film out when it looked so clearly as if it would be dead-on-arrival.

So I began to wonder if maybe it was so astonishingly good that they didn't mind how awful it looked in the trailers, because once word of mouth got out it would be a success.

Now word of mouth has got out, I'm glad I went with my first instinct and avoided the film.

I've also never really liked Green Lantern, or any of DC's lot. They're all so square and dull, not like the swinging hipsters of Marvelville. Hal Jordan's the worst of the lot, with his sensible haircut.

I do quite like the Green Lantern logo though, so I have a t-shirt of it, and now people are going to think I liked the film. Argh.

Steve said...

"emerald energy of willpower"?? Is that like holding in a sneeze?

I won't be going to see this. It looked bad from the trailers. Probably the best thing about this film is your review.

Tone said...

Did try to warn ya.

Paul B Rainey said...

Is Gnort in it? I'm only interested if Gnort is in it.

Rol said...

I didn't see him. He might have been there in the mass of GLs on Oa... but I was half asleep by then.

Rob Wells said...

I don't like Green Lantern either and really don't understand his current popularity. As you say, too powerful and too boring! That and the fact that the trailers looked crap made sure that I didn't go and see this even though I had some free cinema tickets that needed to be used by yesterday and there wasn't much else showing. We chose to see Bridesmaids over Green lantern, and it was surprisingly funny. (You would not believe how many idiots were queueing up to see Transformers 3!)

dave said...

Saw it last night in 3D, and they couldn't even be arsed putting any proper 3d in it. Found it extremely average and I wish it could have been as bad as you reckon because then at least it would have the kitsch factor to it. I just found it dull. You have a team of space cops with massive power - so many opportunities but you spend 95% of the film trying to develop characters with trite dialogue and the chemistry of a bunsen burner.

I din't find Blake Lively too bad, but then again I've seen an episode of Gossip Girl (the one with Art Brut on the soundtrack) so I knew what to expect.

And as for the suit of living Willpower energy - Jog on idiotic writer boy

Nige Lowrey said...

Although predominantly a Marvelite, I also grew up on DC comics so while I rarely liked the comic, I always liked the character of Green Lantern (Hal being my favourite, then Guy, G'nort and Arisia trailing behind).

First time I saw the movie, I liked it as I was expecting an absolute car wreck and it wasn't that bad. It was faithful, most of the performances were strong (especially Hector and particularly Sinestro, not just strong but Mark Strong)and the costume effects actually worked.

However, second time I saw it, it was bumstiffeningly choppy, no real plot to speak of. Fans of the comic can fill in gaps, but that's sloppy storytelling.

Blame Geoff Johns for the concept but he expanded the yellow and green energies to create an emotional spectrum that exists throughout the universe. Each emotion generates a power field of various colours: willpower being the centre of the spectrum is the most powerful but fears generates yellow energy, rage red energy, love violet energy and so on. The power rings access this power for the bearer.

It's a comic idea but it works, and the opening narration in a way is a necessary distillation of this info but by leaving out the mechanics of why, viewers are left going "Well, why's that then?"

It's a shame there will probably be no sequel as the end sequence with Sinestro really makes me want to see a sequel with a Hal/Sinestro smackdown, if not an interCorps smackdowwn, so that's a wasted opportunity...


I have high hops for Mr Rogers next month though...

Mart said...

I didn't mind it!
I guess it's because I have the attention span of a newt, and when I see a movie, I'm always thinking about my comic storylines, so it was dumb enough for me to follow lol.
A lot of my friends that have seen it were very ANGRY though.
I have to admit that the final fight was pretty awful - the crap fist, the deeply unsubtle plan, and the fact that the other GLs could have helped Hal, as they were hovering around.
Parallax could have looked cool if we could have seen what was going on (I take it he had dead people swarming all over him?)
And Angela Bassett should be deeply, deeply ashamed of her acting in this movie...

Lee said...

The reality of my experience watching this film is that I honestly do not care about the character or how it's handled in the cinema.

I never thought the character itself was an easy transition to film and if they'd wanted another property then they should have gone down the Flash route.

That being said then I revelled in the film's rubbish - there are so many plot holes it's just crazy but I think the cast stepped up and tried to carry it off and a lot of it was pretty enough. I appreciate the film for its camp crappiness but would never ever ever recommend anyone actually watch it!

I appreciate this as I appreciate Transformers 2 - sometimes it's nice to watch a really expensive train wreck :)

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails